|
| 基于PMC模型的社情民意信息政策量化评价与可持续发展 |
|
| 投稿时间：2024-02-04 修订日期：2024-02-04 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: |
| 英文关键词: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 226 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| [目的/意义] 社情民意信息收集与分析是推动协商民主和增强人民参与感、幸福感、获得感的关键环节,对全过程民主的可持续发展至关重要。通过PMC指数模型对社情民意信息政策进行科学量化评价来促进政策贯彻效率和全过程民主的可持续发展。[方法/过程] 搜集了29项国家级社情民意政策,并以2007－2021年国家层面出台的9项社情民意政策为研究对象,采用文本挖掘技术并构建了一个包含9个一级指标和37个二级指标的评价指标体系,通过PMC指数模型进行综合评价,首次尝试将量化方法应用于社情民意信息政策的评价,为该领域提供了新的理论视角和实践指导。[结果/结论] 政策的专指性越强,PMC 指数的得分越低；政策的效力级别越高,PMC 指数的得分越高。评价结果显示,3项政策达到完美,6项为优秀,完美政策为P4、P5和P9,优秀政策为P1、P2、P3、P6、p7、p8,这表明社情民意信息政策整体质量表现良好,但仍有提升空间。建议强化政策的长短期效应结合,提升政策激励机制的影响力,并增强政府信息公开的宏观管理,同时明确各部门的执行细则。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| [Purpose/Significance] The collection and analysis of social situation and public opinion information is a key link to promote consultative democracy and enhance people"s sense of participation, happiness and sense of gain, which is crucial for the sustainable development of whole-process democracy. Scientific quantitative evaluation of social situation and public opinion information policies through the PMC index model is carried out to promote the implementation efficiency of policies and the sustainable development of whole-process democracy. [Method/Process]29 national social situation and public opinion policies were collected, and 9 national social situation and public opinion policies issued by China from 2007 to 2021 were taken as the research object. Text mining technology was adopted to construct an evaluation index system containing 9 first-level indicators and 37 second-level indicators, and comprehensive evaluation was carried out through the PMC index model. This is the first attempt to apply quantitative methods to the evaluation of social situation and public opinion information policies, providing a new theoretical perspective and practical guidance for the field. [Result/Conclusion] The stronger the specificity of the policy, the lower the score of PMC index, and the higher the effectiveness level of the policy, the higher the score of PMC index. The evaluation results show that 3 policies are perfect, and 6 are excellent. Perfect policies are P4, P5 and P9, and excellent policies are P1, P2, P3, P6, p7 and p8. This indicates that the overall quality of social situation and public opinion information policies is good, but there is still some room for improvement. It is suggested to strengthen the combination of long-term and short-term effects of policies, enhance the influence of policy incentive mechanism, and enhance the macro management of government information disclosure, while clarifying the implementation rules of various departments. |
|
View Fulltext
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|