|
| 法典化时代领域法范式的不足与弥补 |
|
| 投稿时间：2024-01-05 修订日期：2024-01-05 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: |
| 英文关键词: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 217 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 领域法范式在新兴领域法学的体系化作业中被大量使用,却少有专门研究。分析领域法范式在学科体系化中的优劣,对新兴领域法和领域法范式的发展有重要意义。领域法范式在体系化作业中可聚合相关法律规范,有助于确证新兴领域法学的学科与法律部门独立性,但也导致了法学知识和实体法的碎片化。导致碎片化的主要原因是引入法外理由作为选择应然适用之法律规范的依据,破坏了法学知识和实体法的体系性。弥补方案是用法教义学方法将法外理由转译为法教义学知识,在预设法学知识与实体法的体系性的前提下不断增强其体系性。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The paradigm of domain law is widely used in the systematization of the emerging field of law, but there is little research on it. The analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the paradigm of domain law in the systematization of disciplines is of great significance to the development of the new paradigm of domain law and domain law. The paradigm of domain law can aggregate relevant legal norms in systematic work, which helps to confirm the independence of the discipline and legal department in the emerging field of law, but also leads to the fragmentation of legal knowledge and substantive law. The main reason for the fragmentation is that the introduction of extra-legal reasons as the basis for choosing the applicable legal norms destroys the system of legal knowledge and substantive law. The remedy is to translate the extra-legal reasons into legal dogmatic knowledge by the method of legal dogmatics, and to enhance its systematicness on the premise of the systematicness of legal knowledge and substantive law. |
|
View Fulltext
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|