|
| 基于边际效益理论的认罪认罚从宽制度优化研究 |
|
| 投稿时间：2023-12-03 修订日期：2023-12-03 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: |
| 英文关键词: |
| 基金项目:2023年度甘肃省科技计划资助项目“黄河流域生态保护司法协同机制研究”（项目编号：23JRZA372） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 322 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 认罪认罚从宽制度自设立之初便展示了强大的制度优越性,其有利于促进刑事程序的多元化、实现司法资源的优化配置,并促进案件繁简分流,但该制度也会给现存的司法体制带来新的问题和挑战。传统的法学研究视角在分析该制度的科学性、合理性和正当性,以及如何实现效益最大化方面存在局限性,法经济学的边际效益理论可以为认罪认罚从宽制度的优化提供理论支持。从法经济学视角出发,采用边际效益理论,就该制度的“公正—效率”和“成本—收益”关系进行分析,以寻求现行制度的改良措施,包括容许一定错案率的存在、完善冤假错案的防范与纠正机制、协调诉讼程序简化与减刑比例的关系和明确诉讼程序简化的上限四个方面,从而有助于实现处罚的正当性并助益刑事法治。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The system of leniency in pleading guilty and accepting punishment has demonstrated strong institutional superiority since its inception, and is conducive to promoting the diversification of criminal procedures, the optimal allocation of judicial resources and the diversion of cases into simple and complex ones, but the system will also bring new problems and challenges to the existing judicial system. Traditional legal research perspectives have limitations in analyzing the system"s scientificity, reasonableness and legitimacy, as well as how to maximize its benefits, and the marginal benefit theory of legal economics can provide theoretical support for the optimization of the system of leniency of guilty pleas and penalties. From the perspective of legal economics, the marginal benefit theory is used to analyze the "justice-efficiency" and "cost-benefit" relationships of the system, in order to seek improvement measures for the current system. These include allowing for a certain rate of wrongful convictions, improving the mechanism for preventing and correcting wrongful convictions, harmonizing the relationship between the simplification of proceedings and the proportion of sentence reductions, and clarifying the upper limit of the simplification of proceedings, so as to help realize the legitimacy of penalties and benefit the rule of law in criminal matters. |
|
View Fulltext
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|