| 史新立,裴娜.北方农村地区不同供暖形式对比研究[J].唐山学院学报,2024,37(6):43-47,79 |
| 北方农村地区不同供暖形式对比研究 |
| Comparative Study on Different Heating Forms in Northern China Rural |
| 投稿时间：2024-07-29 |
| DOI：10.16160/j.cnki.tsxyxb.2024.06.007 |
| 中文关键词: 北方农村 燃煤供暖 燃气供暖 电供暖 |
| 英文关键词: northern China rural coal heating gas heating electric heating |
| 基金项目:唐山市建筑节能与绿色建筑检测重点实验室项目(140160001) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 869 |
| 全文下载次数: 833 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 选取了4种北方农村地区常用的供暖形式(燃煤供暖、燃气壁挂炉供暖、电热水锅炉供暖、电热膜+蓄热式电供暖)作为研究对象,通过对典型农户整个供暖季室内外温度及能源消耗量进行测试,分别对其产生的室内热环境、经济性及污染物排放量进行对比分析。研究发现:燃气供暖在室内热环境及环保性方面优于其他供暖形式;电供暖在经济性方面最优,而电热水锅炉供暖和电热膜+蓄热式电供暖相比,二者虽然耗电量明显不同,但运行费用并没有明显差异。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Four commonly-used heating forms in northern China rural (coal heating, gas heater on the wall, electric hot water boiler heating, and electric film + thermal storage electric heating) are selected as the research objects. By testing the indoor and outdoor temperatures and energy consumption of typical households throughout the heating season, the indoor thermal environment, economic efficiency, and pollutant emissions are compared and analyzed. It is found that gas heating is superior to other heating forms in terms of indoor thermal environment and environmental protection; electric heating is the most economical, while electric hot water boiler heating and electric film + thermal storage electric heating, although they have significantly different electricity consumption, does not show a significant difference in operating costs. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|