| 金传送.虚拟财产的刑法类型化保护制度构建[J].唐山学院学报,2023,36(4):101-108 |
| 虚拟财产的刑法类型化保护制度构建 |
| A Framework Construction for Typological Protection of Virtual Property Under Criminal Law |
| |
| DOI：10.16160/j.cnki.tsxyxb.2023.04.016 |
| 中文关键词: 虚拟财产 数据 动态性 类型化 |
| 英文关键词: virtual property data dynamicity typology |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 5457 |
| 全文下载次数: 3796 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 针对涉虚拟财产犯罪行为的规制,学界和司法实践中存在数据犯罪说、财产犯罪说、区别保护说三种观点。各种观点之间立场错位,并未形成有效交锋。刑法在规制涉虚拟财产犯罪行为时,需要结合虚拟财产的数据特性对其属性进行准确认定。虚拟财产的无形性和共享性决定了对虚拟财产的管理和转移要在占有概念规范化的基础上进行解释。虚拟财产的动态性决定了其价值只有在动态利用中才能得以彰显。根据虚拟财产的不同利用方式和利用空间,可以对其属性作出准确认定,构建"无财产性-弱财产性-强财产性"三级涉虚拟财产犯罪行为规制架构。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| There are three perspectives in academic circles and judicial practice regarding the regulation of criminal activities involving virtual property: data crime, property crime, and differential protection. The positions of the various viewpoints are not aligned and do not effectively confront one another. Criminal law must precisely ascertain the type of virtual property along with its data characteristics in order to regulate criminal conduct involving virtual property. The administration and transfer of virtual property should be understood in light of the normalization of the concept of possession due to the intangible and shared character of the virtual property. Due to their dynamic nature,virtual properties can only have its value shown through their dynamic use. Based on the various ways and spaces of utilization, the characteristics of virtual property may be precisely determined,and a three-tier framework of "no-property, weak-property and strong property" control of illegal acts involving virtual property can be built. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|