文章摘要
辛有仪.催收非法债务罪中“非法债务”的规范解读[J].唐山学院学报,2023,36(2):68-75
催收非法债务罪中“非法债务”的规范解读
Normative Explanation of “Illeagal Debts” in the Crime of Collecting Illegal Debts
  
DOI:10.16160/j.cnki.tsxyxb.2023.02.010
中文关键词: 催收非法债务罪  法益  债务  刑法修正案
英文关键词: crime of collecting illegal debts  legal interests  debts  Amendments to the Criminal Law
基金项目:司法部2020年度法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目(20SFB4021)
作者单位
辛有仪 西北政法大学 刑事法学院, 西安 710061 
摘要点击次数: 4826
全文下载次数: 3190
中文摘要:
      《刑法修正案(十一)》新增催收非法债务罪,对催收高利放贷等产生的非法债务的行为进行了类型化规制,但其中"非法债务"并无明确定义,亟须厘清其内涵。首先,需要明晰催收非法债务罪的保护法益,即国家对讨债行为的社会管理秩序和公民人身、财产安全的复合法益。其次,以本罪的保护法益内容为指导,以债的理论为基础,通过文义解释与分析"非法债务"和"法律不予保护的债务"的关系,厘清非法债务的具体内涵。据此,亦能将高利放贷债务、赌博债务、"套路贷"债务的定性问题予以妥当解释。
英文摘要:
      The Amendments to the Criminal Law(XI)established the crime of collecting illegal debts, which regulates the illegal debts caused by usury. However, the"illegal debt"is not clearly defined, therefore it is urgent to clarify its connotation. First of all, it is necessary to clearly analyze the protection legal interests of the crime of collecting illegal debts, i.e. the compound legal interests of the state’s social management order of debt collection, security of the person and their property. Secondly, guided by the content of legal interests protection of this crime, and based on the theory of debt, the specific connotation of illegal debt can be clarified by interpreting and analyzing the relationship between "illegal debt" and "debt not protected by law". On this basis, we can also properly explain the qualitative problems of the usury debt, gambling debt and "arbitrage loan" debt.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
分享按钮

漂浮通知

关闭
关于《唐山学院学报》不收版面费的声明