| 赵晏民.技术侦查证据规范运用之进路[J].唐山学院学报,2018,31(5):37-43 |
| 技术侦查证据规范运用之进路 |
| The Way to Standardize the Evidence of Technical Investigation |
| |
| DOI：10.16160/j.cnki.tsxyxb.2018.05.006 |
| 中文关键词: 技术侦查证据 证据转化 庭外核实 非法技术侦查证据 |
| 英文关键词: evidence of technical investigation evidence conversion out-of-court verification evidence of illegal technical investigation |
| 基金项目:最高人民检察院检察理论项目（GJ2018C18） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 8085 |
| 全文下载次数: 6403 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 2012年《刑事诉讼法》赋予技术侦查证据以证据能力，但由于技术侦查证据规范的不完善导致技术侦查措施面临从幕后走到台前的滥用风险，并引发了三大层面的价值矛盾，即保守秘密与人权保障的矛盾、证据价值发挥与司法资源合理配置的矛盾、真实发现与程序正义之间的矛盾。矛盾冲突的化解有赖于制度的力量，技术侦查证据规范本土化的构建思路为：对证据审查模式进行梯度设计、明确技术侦查证据使用的决定主体、构建非法技术侦查证据排除规则。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The Criminal Procedure Law of 2012 offered the evidence of technical investigation evidential effect,but the technical investigation measures are faced with abuse risk from being behind-the-scenes to publicly known, due to imperfect norms in relevant laws. The imperfection has led to three levels of value contradiction:the contradiction between secrets keeping and human rights protection,the contradiction between the use of evidence value and the rational allocation of judicial resources, and the contradiction between true discovery and procedural justice. The resolution of the above contradictions depends on the power of a system. Therefore, the construction of localization is presented as follows:gradient design of the evidence review model,specification of the body deciding the use of technical investigation evidence,and construction of the exclusionary rules for the evidence of illegal technical investigation. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |