王亚旗.ChatGPT生成物的性质界定、权利归属与侵权风险[J].唐山学院学报,2025,38(2):61-69 |
ChatGPT生成物的性质界定、权利归属与侵权风险 |
The Nature Definition, Rights Ownership and Infringement Risks of ChatGPT-Generated Products |
投稿时间:2023-09-23 |
DOI:10.16160/j.cnki.tsxyxb.2025.02.009 |
中文关键词: ChatGPT|刑事责任主体|著作权|法律风险|人工智能生成物 |
英文关键词: ChatGPT|subject of criminal responsibility|copyright|legal risk|artificial intelligence products |
基金项目: |
|
摘要点击次数: 240 |
全文下载次数: 136 |
中文摘要: |
ChatGPT的问世开创了生成式人工智能发展的新篇章,其中蕴含的法律问题也亟待理论上的回应与解决。ChatGPT生成物属于文艺、科学领域内具有独创性并能以一定形式表现的智力成果,应视为受著作权法保护的作品。对于ChatGPT生成物的权利主体应遵从实质性智力贡献的版权归属原则,根据不同的创作模式进行分别认定。ChatGPT生成物具有著作财产权属性,可以成为刑法上的著作权犯罪的对象。ChatGPT不具有刑事责任能力,无法成为刑事责任主体。ChatGPT存在假冒注册商标罪、侵犯著作权罪、侵犯商业秘密罪等知识产权犯罪风险。 |
英文摘要: |
The advent of ChatGPT has opened a new chapter in the development of generative artificial intelligence(AI), and the legal issues contained in it are also in urgent need of theoretical response and solution. ChatGPT-generated products belong to intellectual achievements in the fields of literature, art and science that possess originality and can be expressed in a certain form, and should be regarded as works protected by copyright law. The subject of the rights of ChatGPT-generated products should adopt the principle of copyright attribution of substantive intellectual contribution and be identified separately according to different creation modes. The product has the attribute of the property right of works and can be the object of criminal copyright infringement. ChatGPT does not have criminal responsibility capacity and cannot become the subject of criminal responsibility. It has risks of intellectual property crimes such as counterfeiting registered trademark, copyright infringement, trade secret infringement and so on. |
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |