| 周星越.浅谈国际刑事法院的管辖权问题[J].唐山学院学报,2022,35(1):63-72 |
| 浅谈国际刑事法院的管辖权问题 |
| On the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court |
| |
| DOI：10.16160/j.cnki.tsxyxb.2022.01.008 |
| 中文关键词: 国际刑事法院 管辖权 中国立场 罗马规约 |
| 英文关键词: International Criminal Court(ICC) jurisdiction China’s position Rome Statute |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 7547 |
| 全文下载次数: 5347 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 《罗马规约》以及相关文书的生效，表明国际刑事法院正式成立，其满足了二战以来国际社会对于惩治严重威胁人类和平与安全的违法犯罪的要求。但同时国际刑事法院管辖权在实际运行中存在着公正性受质疑、国际认可度不足、安理会干预和执行困难等问题，需要进一步完善。文章结合国际刑事法院管辖权运行的现实境地，对国际刑事法院管辖权补充性、自动性、有限性与普遍性等属性和管辖权效力范围等方面进行探讨，以阐明国际刑事法院管辖权面临的困境，明确我国目前对于《罗马规约》的态度和立场，并提出国际刑事法院管辖权的本土化确立进路。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The entry into force of the Rome Statute and the relevant instruments indicates the formal establishment of the International Criminal Court(ICC), which has met the international community’s requirements for punishing crimes that seriously threaten the peace and security of mankind since the Second World War. But at the same time, in the actual operation of the jurisdiction of this court, there are some problems, such as doubt of impartiality, lack of international recognition, intervention of the Security Council and difficulties in implementation, which need to be further improved. Based on the actual operation of its jurisdiction,this paper discusses the jurisdiction scope and jurisdiction attributes such as being complementary, automatic, finite and universal, so as to illustrate the plight of the jurisdiction for the International Criminal Court, to make China’s current attitude and position on joining the Rome statute clear, and then puts forward localized approach for its jurisdiction. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|