| 卢芸蓉.伍非百名学研究之对比法[J].唐山学院学报,2019,32(5):60-64 |
| 伍非百名学研究之对比法 |
| Wu Feibai's Method of Comparison and Contrast for the Study of Mingxue |
| |
| DOI：10.16160/j.cnki.tsxyxb.2019.05.010 |
| 中文关键词: 伍非百 中国古名家言 对比法 |
| 英文关键词: Wu Feibai Zhong Guo Gu Ming Jia Yan(Ancient Chinese Logician Analects) comparison and contrast |
| 基金项目:江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究项目（2017SJB0353） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 8526 |
| 全文下载次数: 6229 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 伍非百对古名家篇籍《中国古名家言》的校释与研究，一以贯之地执行着对比法，不仅得到了一些新颖、独到的见解，也系统化了其名学思想。其运用的对比法主要有"对比校释而择优选之""对比校释而新校遗误" "对比研读而以典释典""对比修正而自我完善"四种类型。这些对比法以及伍非百的其他典籍整理手段对于我们今天研读、校注、研究古籍都有一定的借鉴作用。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Wu Feibai' interpretation and research on ancient Mingjia (logician) works have always been involved with the comparison and contrast, which has not only produced some new and original insights, but also systematized his thoughts on Mingxue(study of Logic). There are four types of comparison and contrast for him:comparative interpretation and selecting the best, comparative interpretation and amending errors, comparative research in the way of "interpretation by other ancient classics", and "comparative revision and self-improvement". These techniques and other means of sorting out ancient classics are helpful for us to interpret,annotate and study ancient classics today. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |