崔鲁威,王立敏.李大钊与何炳松史学思想比较研究[J].唐山学院学报,2019,32(4):26-32,37 |
李大钊与何炳松史学思想比较研究 |
Comparative Study Between Li Daozhao's and He Bingsong's Historical Thoughts |
|
DOI:10.16160/j.cnki.tsxyxb.2019.04.005 |
中文关键词: 李大钊 何炳松 史学思想 |
英文关键词: Li Dazhao He Bingsong historical thoughts |
基金项目: |
|
摘要点击次数: 8272 |
全文下载次数: 6061 |
中文摘要: |
李大钊与何炳松都是20世纪上半期颇有影响的史学家,在推动中国史学的现代化方面发挥了重大作用。李大钊比较系统地引进了马克思主义基本原理,并将其作为分析历史问题的重要方法,推动了唯物史观在中国的发展,由此,马克思主义史学在中国蓬勃兴起。何炳松注重翻译"新史学学派"的著作,独树一帜地开启了以鲁滨逊为代表的"新史学学派"在中国的传播。在史学思想方面,李大钊与何炳松对历史学的相关概念、历史学的学科性质、历史学的研究方法、历史学的功用等有着许多相似的认识,同时也存在明显的差异。二人在坚持自己学术观点的同时构建了自己的史学理论框架,形成了各自的史学理论体系,对后世产生了巨大的影响。 |
英文摘要: |
Li Dazhao and He Bingsong are both very influential historians in the first half of the 20th century,who played a significant role in promoting the modernization of Chinese historiography. Li Dazhao systematically introduced the basic principles of Marxism as an important method to analyze historical issues, which promoted the development of historical materialism in China and after which Marxist historians mushroomed in China. He Bingsong focused on the translation of the writings of New History School,and uniquely began to spread this School in China with Robinson as its representative. In the aspect of historiographical thoughts, He Bingsong and Li Dazhao had many similarities in related concepts of historiography,the nature of the discipline of history, the methods of historical research and the function of history, but they also had many distinct differences. They built their own historical theoretical framework and formed their own theoretical system while they stuck to their academic viewpoints,which had a tremendous impact on the future generations. |
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |
|
|
|